<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Consuming Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog</link>
	<description>Conditionalism  Mortalism  Physicalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Torture</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/10/torture/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/10/torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s often the case that traditionalists will object when their detractors use &#8220;torture&#8221; to describe the traditional view of final punishment. In Hell Under Fire, Christopher Morgan challenges Clark Pinnock on this point: &#8220;…notice [Pinnock's] pejorative use of &#8216;torture&#8217; rather &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/10/torture/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/10/torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Traditionalism&#8221; a Pejorative?</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/05/is-traditionalism-a-pejorative/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/05/is-traditionalism-a-pejorative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally, some adherent to the traditional view of final punishment (viz. everlasting torment) will get up in arms over being called a &#8220;traditionalist.&#8221; Usually, the offender will be charged with poisoning the well and intentionally using &#8220;traditionalism&#8221; to illegitimately score &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/05/is-traditionalism-a-pejorative/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/05/is-traditionalism-a-pejorative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nature of Final Punishment Debate on Unbelievable? Radio Show</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/03/nature-of-final-punishment-debate-on-unbelievable-radio-show/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/03/nature-of-final-punishment-debate-on-unbelievable-radio-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[annihilationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friend and fellow conditionalist Chris Date, host of the Theopologetics podcast, recently appeared on the Unbelievable? radio show to debate Steve Jeffery on the nature of final punishment. Click here for the audio stream. As is often the case, the &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/03/nature-of-final-punishment-debate-on-unbelievable-radio-show/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2012/03/nature-of-final-punishment-debate-on-unbelievable-radio-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conditionalism Debate</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/10/conditionalism-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/10/conditionalism-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[annihilationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My debate with TurretinFan is now up at Theopologetics. Feel free to ask questions or provide feedback in the comments. Citations for Quotes Used in Opening Statement &#8220;Annihilationism is the belief that those who die apart from saving faith in &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/10/conditionalism-debate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/10/conditionalism-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Part of &#8220;Will Consume&#8221; Did You Not Understand?</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/09/what-part-of-will-consume-did-you-not-understand/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/09/what-part-of-will-consume-did-you-not-understand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conditionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of the book of Hebrews wrote: For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/09/what-part-of-will-consume-did-you-not-understand/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/09/what-part-of-will-consume-did-you-not-understand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Alcorn Takes John Stott Out of Context</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/07/taking-john-stott-out-of-context/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/07/taking-john-stott-out-of-context/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sloppy scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many traditionalists share the unfortunate habit of suspecting the motives of anyone who believes that Scripture teaches something other than everlasting torment. Most critical evaluations of conditionalism that I&#8217;ve read contain at least a comment or two probing the hidden &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/07/taking-john-stott-out-of-context/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/07/taking-john-stott-out-of-context/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erasing Hell is Actually a Decent Book</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/erasing-hell-is-actually-a-decent-book/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/erasing-hell-is-actually-a-decent-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received my copy of Erasing Hell, coauthored by Francis Chan and Preston Sprinkle. I was more than a little annoyed by Chan&#8217;s teaser video, so my expectations were admittedly low. I&#8217;m happy to say that the book isn&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/erasing-hell-is-actually-a-decent-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/erasing-hell-is-actually-a-decent-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Peoples Puts Traditionalist Scholarship on Blast</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/glenn-peoples-puts-traditionalist-scholarship-on-blast/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/glenn-peoples-puts-traditionalist-scholarship-on-blast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sloppy scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Peoples, one of the most able contemporary critics of traditionalism, has posted a lengthy open letter delineating the current state—and major failings—of traditionalist scholarship. Here&#8217;s just one gem that I think will ring true for any serious conditionalist: From &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/glenn-peoples-puts-traditionalist-scholarship-on-blast/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/glenn-peoples-puts-traditionalist-scholarship-on-blast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Christopher Morgan Read Isaiah 66:24?</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/has-christopher-morgan-read-isaiah-6624/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/has-christopher-morgan-read-isaiah-6624/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sloppy scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 5, Christopher Morgan was a guest on the Stand to Reason radio show, hosted by Greg Koukl. In case you&#8217;re not in the know, Morgan is among the most vocal contemporary defenders of traditionalism, and is often consulted &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/has-christopher-morgan-read-isaiah-6624/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/has-christopher-morgan-read-isaiah-6624/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Edition of The Fire That Consumes Now Available</title>
		<link>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/third-edition-of-the-fire-that-consumes-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/third-edition-of-the-fire-that-consumes-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conditionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Fudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conditionalism.net/blog/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to an explosion of blog activity, recent months have seen a spate of hastily published books, written in response to Rob Bell&#8217;s Love Wins. For instance, here, here, and here—and who said evangelicals tend to overreact? In the &#8230; <a href="http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/third-edition-of-the-fire-that-consumes-now-available/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conditionalism.net/blog/2011/06/third-edition-of-the-fire-that-consumes-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
